Template:Did you know nominations/Devil's Bargain
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Devil's Bargain
[edit]- ... that Devil's Bargain describes how Steve Bannon used his experience at Breitbart News to gather white men to support Donald Trump? Quote: "Green argues that Bannon's experiences with Breitbart gave him a framework for mobilizing disaffected young white male voters who were attracted to Trump.". Source: Gross, Terry. "Inside The 'Shakespearean Irony' Of Trump And Bannon's Relationship". Fresh Air. NPR.
- ALT1:... that Devil's Bargain by Joshua Green details the rise of the alt-right during the 2016 U.S. presidential election? Source: Stephens, Bret (July 18, 2017). "How Steve Bannon and Donald Trump Rode the Honey Badger Into the White House". The New York Times.
- Reviewed: Charmayne James
- Comment: Created on 21 July 2017 by Czar, expanded same day by Sagecandor. Article size is over 3,000 characters.
Created by Czar (talk) and Sagecandor (talk). Nominated by Sagecandor (talk) at 00:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC).
- @Czar and Sagecandor: I will review this article. epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- This was an easy review since there was nothing wrong with this article's eligibility for DYK. However, it does read a bit clunkily, and I've removed some of the awkward punctuation. Otherwise, nice work! epicgenius (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius:Thank you! Sagecandor (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- This was an easy review since there was nothing wrong with this article's eligibility for DYK. However, it does read a bit clunkily, and I've removed some of the awkward punctuation. Otherwise, nice work! epicgenius (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)